A new brain-imaging study is shedding light on what it means to "get lost" in a good book — suggesting that readers create vivid mental simulations of the sounds, sights, tastes and movements described in a textual narrative while simultaneously activating brain regions used to process similar experiences in real life.
Does that mean that stories use the same brain areas as real-life?
Or that what we conceive to be real-life is really happening in the same brain areas as fiction but with the added benefit or sensorial input? Both seem to operate in the same fashion. A friend who studies lucid dreaming also expects the similar brain areas to fire up when a dreamer acquires lucidity.
Real-life worldviews are of the same substance as more or less educated stories?
That would render myths, legends, fallacies, and other imaginary constructions indistinguishable from evidence-supported hypothesis.